Aus: the folly of absolutes

August 28, 2007 at 9:57 pm 4 comments

Two stories from Australia serve as a timely reminder about the folly of thinking in absolutes.

The first one is the Australian Government’s efforts around porn filters. They proudly announced the launch of free porn filters for families at the considerable cost of (AU) $84 million. Imagine the government’s embarrassment when a 16 year old schoolboy broke the filters in half an hour and an updated version in 40 minutes.

The government was forced to declare that, “… the government has always maintained, no filter is foolproof.” Right, now that’s backing away from absolutes.

The second story comes from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). Investigations showed that 27 staff had gained unauthorised access to personal tax records in 2006. Now, a dozen people have been sacked or resigned after being caught doing the same thing.

An ATO spokeswoman said, “While no level of unauthorised access is acceptable, in an organisation of about 22,000 people it is inevitable that a very small number of people will be tempted to do the wrong thing.”

“Inevitable” is a way of saying that government cannot absolutely make sure that it will keep taxpayer information that it is legally required to be kept confidential safe from unauthorised employees.

It’s realistic not to set up expectations of absolutes.

On another note, this leads to a re-emphasising of a security truism: the biggest threat to privacy and protecting personal information comes from the inside while the popular notion about security is keeping the bad guys out.

Entry filed under: Aus, data_breach, fraud, government, identity, network, personal_info, privacy, security, strategy, trust.

NZ data breach law: quick and light England: a bigger folly

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Firewall « Identity Blogger  |  August 28, 2007 at 11:41 pm

    […] This is a slight departure from my other DYI demotivators in that the center image is not a photograph. The center image is from here. There is more about the Maginot Line analogy of Deperimeterization here. You can read more about the Jericho Forum here. There is also a related article here. […]

  • 2. England: a bigger folly « Identity and Privacy Blog  |  August 29, 2007 at 10:46 pm

    […] 29, 2007 I wrote yesterday about the folly of absolutes in Australia. This provides one good reason why England’s plans for a national children […]

  • 3. Australia’s Big Mother « Identity and Privacy Blog  |  September 4, 2007 at 10:52 pm

    […] about the Australian Government’s efforts in protecting families from Internet porn by providing free filters that were broken by a schoolboy in 30 […]

  • […] I’ve mentioned earlier in a post about the folly of absolutes, there is no point trying to set an expectation of a foolproof […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

This blog is no longer updated. See the About page for more info. I'm currently active on Twitter.

Follow me on twitter


%d bloggers like this: